Archive for April, 2006

Global Extinction Crisis … Are We Next?

Saturday, April 29th, 2006

By David L. Brown

The loss of biodiversity through the extinction of species is a significant concern for our planet. The seriousness of the situation is underlined by this excerpt is from an article that appeared in SCIENCE magazine, by J. A. Thomas et al., 19 March 2004, titled “Comparative Losses of British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis:”

There is growing concern about increased population, regional, and global extinctions of species. A key question is whether extinction rates for one group of organisms are representative of other taxa. We present a comparison at the national scale of population and regional extinctions of birds, butterflies, and vascular plants from Britain in recent decades. Butterflies experienced the greatest net losses, disappearing on average from 13% of their previously occupied 10-kilometer squares. If insects elsewhere in the world are similarly sensitive, the known global extinction rates of vertebrate and plant species have an unrecorded parallel among the invertebrates, strengthening the hypothesis that the natural world is experiencing the sixth major extinction event in its history.

The phrases “Global extinction crisis” and “sixth major extinction event in its history” should galvanize the attention of anyone having an interest in the future of the Earth. Indeed, species loss has been accelerating over the past centuries and has reached a cataclysmic level. By some estimates as many as 50-100 species are becoming extinct every day.

As species disappear from the Earth, the planet becomes a poorer place. Biodiversity is the key to a healthy environment, and that diversity is being steadily chipped away by the loss of species. One cannot escape the poignant question: When will it be the turn of humankind to join the long list of extinct species? It’s a question worth thinking about, and a subject we will be visiting on a regular basis.

Humanity’s Glorious Future on Planet Ponzi

Saturday, April 29th, 2006

By David L. Brown

For decades we have been promised that there is a future for humankind in Space. This is one of the biggest con games to have been perpetrated on the public since Charles Ponzi and his famous “scheme.”

It has been thouroughly demonstrated that humans are very ill-suited to living in Space. The International Space Station is a disaster, never having attained its original purpose. It never will. In fact, it is an unmitigated failure and should be shut down immediately. But, there are political reasons why this has not happened.

The Space Shuttle program, as another example, has also proven to be a technological disaster. Out of about 115 missions flown, two of five Shuttles, or 40 percent of all Shuttles ever built, have ended in fiery death for the unfortunate pilots and crew. Think of it … with only a little over 100 missions spread over five vessels, the average number of missions is about 23 per Shuttle. Two of five have been lost (so far) with only this small number of missions. If the civil air industry experienced this rate of failure, about 20 airliners would be blowing up, crashing, disintegrating, or disappearing off the radar screen every day. And, civil aviation would be a thing of the past.

(more…)

Switchgrass … Energy Source of the Future? Not!

Saturday, April 29th, 2006

By David L. Brown

President Bush told us in the SOTU address that switchgrass will solve our energy problem. “Switchgrass”? WHAT! Is the USDA going to start paying farmers to grow … switchgrass?! Well, this is something that will grow on poor soils, so let’s imagine that we are going to plow up and seed these poor soils to switchgrass. Then, the first rain that comes along is going to erode the hell out of it, but nevermind, that will just enrich the Delta I suppose. But then we have the problem of harvesting the switchgrass, drying the switchgrass, transporting the switchgrass, and somehow processing the switchgrass to produce energy. I have seen a suggestion that it be mixed with coal to feed power plants, so it would have to be prepared somehow, perhaps by being chopped and run through a pelleting mill, then added to the coal stream.

(more…)

The End of the World … a Laughing Matter?

Friday, April 28th, 2006

Setting all reason aside, this category on the Star Phoenix Base website is intended to provide a humorous safety valve amid a deluge of deadly serious information.

Here, we will sometimes post silly, outrageous, often sarcastic commentary. Try to find the humor in tragedy and you have placed your hand on the secret of inner peace. It has been said that there is a direct relationship between one’s intelligence and one’s sense of humor. We believe this to be true, which is why we have made room on this site for a bit of fun. Check out this category when you need to bring a smile to your face or lift your spirits.

Let the Sun Shine In

Friday, April 28th, 2006

The Sun bathes the Earth with an enormous amount of energy every day. Our star is the source of nearly all energy on Earth … and yet, we largely ignore those powerful solar rays in favor of burning fossil fuels, damming up rivers, splitting atoms, and engaging in other activities that harm the planet and provide no renewable sources of energy.

Solar power is the ultimate resource, because for all practical purposes it is infinite. Except for wind, geothermal and wave power, no other eneregy sources meet this criterion. In Star Phoenix Base we will regularly seek out and report developments in photo-voltaics and other technologies to harness the power of our Sun.

Economists Blowing Smoke

Friday, April 28th, 2006

By David L. Brown

Economics, the dismal science, fails miserably when it comes to evaluating the long-term impact of resource depletion. If we were to apply the common-sense factors of future value to current resources, we would find them to be far more valuable in the future than they are today. Economists tend to ignore this fact. For all practical purposes, economists seem to believe that when any resource is used up, demand will cause a suitable alternative to be discovered and developed. (more…)

Ford Motor Co. Gets Something for Nothing

Friday, April 28th, 2006

By David L. Brown

This item from CNN.com describes how the generous Ford Motor Company is going to “help” its customers who buy its gas guzzling pollution-mobiles to buy themselves some freedom from guilt. Cleverly, this will cost Ford nothing and (they think) make them appear to be environmentally consciencious and generous.

Ford to Help Drivers Pay Off Their Pollution

DETROIT, April 26 (Reuters) – Ford Motor Co. said it will give consumers concerned
about harmful greenhouse emissions an opportunity to invest in clean energy projects via a new Web Site that will calculate suggested investments based on the amount of carbon dioxide produced while driving.
In a program called “Greener Miles,” which is expected to be announced on Thursday, consumers can go to the Web Site to calculate the amount of carbon dioxide produced in one year of driving. The Web site will then suggest an investment linked to the cost of producing an amount of clean energy equivalent to the carbon dioxide produced.
Ford is partnering with TerraPass, a group that helps finance solar, wind and methane-driven energy projects, for the project, Niel Golightly, director of Ford’s sustainable business strategies, told Reuters in an interview.

“We know that there is a growing number of customers out there that are starting to raise questions about this whole subject of climate change and energy security… and looking for things they can do to address it,” Golightly said.

Ford may discover that it is not to their benefit to send their customers to a web site where they can calculate just how much Earth-damaging CO2 their vehicles spew into the atmosphere and the lungs of their neigbors.

How Many People Can Earth Support?

Friday, April 28th, 2006

By David L. Brown

In 1798, Thomas Malthus published his “Essay on the Principles of Population,” in which he predicted that a limit would be reached in the number of human beings that could be supported by the Earth. Much later, in 1968 Paul Ehrlich published his book “The Population Bomb” in which he made a similar projection and went so far as to predict that the limits would be reached during the last decades of the 20th Century.

(more…)

More Trouble Ahead for World’s Oceans

Friday, April 28th, 2006

By David L. Brown

Two-thirds of our planet are covered by ocean, and the seas were the source of all life on Earth. Even today, the oceans play a key role in generating weather patterns, the oxygen in our atmosphere through the biological activity of plankton and algae, and as a major source of protein-rich fish for a hungry world.

But as is well known, our oceans are in rapid decline. Their waters are becoming polluted with toxic wastes. Their vast fisheries are being strip mined by greedy nations with no concern for the long term effects of their actions. Their waters are growing warmer, leading to coral death, plankton depletion, and having a significant and growing effect on the world’s climate.

Without question, the oceans that girdle our globe are in trouble, and their future is tied to the fate of all life on Earth. Star Phoenix Base will keep an eye on this important ecological subject.

Nuclear Power … Too Little Too Late?

Friday, April 28th, 2006

By David L. Brown

The development of efficient breeder reactor designs during the 1950s and 60s was followed by a virtual shut-down of construction of nuclear power plants in the U.S. Now, several decades later, President Bush said in his 2006 State of the Uniion address that he plans to take the nation back toward atomic power as a means of reducing dependence on imports of oil and gas.

In our opinion, this is too little, too late. During the last phase of nuclear power plant construction in the early 1980s, it took approximately 15-20 years to build a new nuclear plant, including licensing and site approval. If nuclear power were to be an answer for us today, we should have begun to build new plants 15-20 years ago.

(more…)