<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Diabolically Misleading Magazine Cover Ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starphoenixbase.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starphoenixbase.com/?p=443</link>
	<description>Your portal to the world of the near future and the dangers that lie ahead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://starphoenixbase.com/?p=443&#038;cpage=1#comment-6380</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starphoenixbase.com/?p=443#comment-6380</guid>
		<description>Hello, David, 

Our household subscribes to NEWSWEEK and so I&#039;ve had a chance to peruse this issue at some length, as well.  The cover put me off, too, at first, but then the grim humor of it all took over and now I think it&#039;s just fine.  That is, &quot;global warming&quot; actually IS a hoax because what we&#039;re actually facing is &quot;global climate disaster,&quot; pure and simple.  Yes, indeed, that&#039;s what it is and that&#039;s what we&#039;re in fact up against.  

However, the true high-hilarity of the issue is to be seen on page 29, where none other than Sen. &quot;Jay&quot; Rockefeller is quoted as saying that the climate naysayers, funded in the main by Exxon-Mobil, have published some &quot;very questionable data.&quot;  Let me see, what is &quot;Jay&#039;s&quot; real name?  Could it be &quot;John D. Rockefeller, IV?&quot;  Yes, it could, as befits the great-grandson of the founder of both Exxon (Standard Oil of New Jersey) and Mobil (Standard Oil of New York).  

Now, THAT&#039;S a hoax -- of sorts -- because Sen. Rockefeller, a Democrat (!) and one of the world&#039;s most spectacularly oil-soaked men, is now chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, from which height he has done just about nothing concerning the war in oil-soaked Iraq, or about &quot;global warming,&quot; either.   In fact, his style of &quot;condemnation&quot; amounts almost to faint praise, it seems to me.  

Also to be seen on page 29 are the results of a recent NEWSWEEK poll showing that far fewer than half of all Americans are willing to do anything important about &quot;global warming.&quot;  What they might be willing to do about 
&quot;global climate catastrophe&quot; was not reported.  --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, David, </p>
<p>Our household subscribes to NEWSWEEK and so I&#8217;ve had a chance to peruse this issue at some length, as well.  The cover put me off, too, at first, but then the grim humor of it all took over and now I think it&#8217;s just fine.  That is, &#8220;global warming&#8221; actually IS a hoax because what we&#8217;re actually facing is &#8220;global climate disaster,&#8221; pure and simple.  Yes, indeed, that&#8217;s what it is and that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re in fact up against.  </p>
<p>However, the true high-hilarity of the issue is to be seen on page 29, where none other than Sen. &#8220;Jay&#8221; Rockefeller is quoted as saying that the climate naysayers, funded in the main by Exxon-Mobil, have published some &#8220;very questionable data.&#8221;  Let me see, what is &#8220;Jay&#8217;s&#8221; real name?  Could it be &#8220;John D. Rockefeller, IV?&#8221;  Yes, it could, as befits the great-grandson of the founder of both Exxon (Standard Oil of New Jersey) and Mobil (Standard Oil of New York).  </p>
<p>Now, THAT&#8217;S a hoax &#8212; of sorts &#8212; because Sen. Rockefeller, a Democrat (!) and one of the world&#8217;s most spectacularly oil-soaked men, is now chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, from which height he has done just about nothing concerning the war in oil-soaked Iraq, or about &#8220;global warming,&#8221; either.   In fact, his style of &#8220;condemnation&#8221; amounts almost to faint praise, it seems to me.  </p>
<p>Also to be seen on page 29 are the results of a recent NEWSWEEK poll showing that far fewer than half of all Americans are willing to do anything important about &#8220;global warming.&#8221;  What they might be willing to do about<br />
&#8220;global climate catastrophe&#8221; was not reported.  &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
