Archive for the ‘Desertification and Soil Loss’ Category

My New Book

Sunday, October 31st, 2010

By David L. Brown

depcovercropI am pleased to announce the publication of my new book DEAD END PATH: How Industrial Agriculture Has Stolen Our Future. This work, in the form of an extended essay, is the result of a lifetime of experience and study. It is written in an easy-to-read style and thoroughly documented with more than 250 footnotes and a bibliography of nearly 150 volumes included in its nearly 300 pages.

DEAD END PATH is unusual in that it is part essay, part memoir, part speculative journalism and part research-based analysis. It examines the serious challenges that face the human race, including the unhappy facts that as human population continues to grow the resources on which our technological civilization depends are being depleted through runaway “progress” and “development,” code words for the destruction of the environment in the interests of profit for the few.

Many of the ideas in this book have been discussed in this weblog, including population issues, resource peaks, and economic considerations. The main argument of DEAD END PATH is that while most of the structural problems of our civilization can be traced to over-population, that core fact itself rests on the short-sighted use of industrial methods to produce more food in the short term than the Earth can sustain. As resources peak and begin to decline, a food crisis looms ahead of us at the terminus of the path we have taken.

To give you the general flavor of this work, here is the official description from the publisher’s website:

DEAD END PATH is an important book because it describes in simple, jargon-free words the critical dangers facing humanity, including many facts that the media seldom report. It’s an extended essay on how industrial agriculture has led us down an unsustainable path that threatens our very civilization. The danger is real and looming before us in the here-and-now. Our petroleum-based technology is reaching its limits and the coming collapse will likely trigger a domino-like food crisis that will change the world forever.

Readers will learn how machine technology has transformed food production and pitted the human race against Nature herself. Topics include over-population, resource depletion, climate change, economic realities and the long-term outlook for human survival. Part journalism, part history, part memoir, part essay — this book aims to entertain and inform curious readers in non-technical language. The subjects of this book are possibly the most important issues of the 21st Century, a stark reality that is little reported by the media and largely ignored by world leaders. Every thinking person should be aware of this looming threat to civilization, the real-life story that unfolds in the pages of DEAD END PATH.

To help bring the message of DEAD END PATH to a wider audience, I have begun to create a new website at www.agdeadend.com. It is only partially constructed, but you may find it interesting to visit it now to read the text of the Author’s Note from the book in which I explain my personal life’s journey and how it resulted in the writing of this book. Please bookmark and return to it as it takes form. It will contain news and commentary relating to the subject of the book.

Australian Dust Warns of Declining Water

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

By David L. Brown

duststorm1According to Wired magazine’s web site, the dust storm that engulfed Sydney, Australia three days ago was “apocalyptic.” In this image taken from space, that description doesn’t  seem over-the-top. You can see this and another NASA image here. According to the Wired article, the source of at least some of the dust was farmland that has been dried out during several years of severe drought.

Australia has long had a reputation as a desert continent, but more so in recent years. The Murray-Darling river system that provides irrigation water for the nation’s major agricultural region has virtually dried up after three years of dry weather. And  according to environmental journalist Fred Pearce, writing a few months ago in the UK newspaper The Guardian, “the drought has cut the country’s exports of thirsty crops such as rice, sugar and wheat by more than half. And the talk down under is that the drought is a near-permanent consequence of global warming.”

According to Pearce, Australia is the world’s largest exporter of “virtual water,” water that has been converted into food crops for sale abroad. He warns that “as the Murray and dozens of others rivers run dry across the planet, water is becoming the key constraint on food production. More than land, the availability of water now defines how full the world’s granaries are – and what price we pay for our daily bread.” You can read the rest of Pearce’s article, which originally appeared on April 17, at this link.

Water is one of the key elements in agricultural production, and like many other resources it is becoming scarce. The Colorado River, before it reaches the Gulf of California in Mexico, runs dry most of the time. The water is sucked out far upstream to supply  growing cities such as Las Vegas and Phoenix, and to irrigate crops on land that would otherwise be unable to produce a crop.

The Colorado is not alone in this, for rivers around the world are running dry. One factor is the diminishing snow pack and glaciers on high mountain ranges, the Alps in Europe, Himalayas in Asia and  Andes in South America. Without a steady flow of meltwater through the summer growing seasons, the rivers flood early and dry up later, creating  havoc among farmers and threatening the world’s food supply.

And as the rivers disappear, the dust rises to fill the  air. Few of us have been around long enough to remember the Dust Bowl days on the 1930s, but we have heard stories of air so thick with dirt that some farmers had to stretch ropes between their houses and barns to keep from becoming lost. On Wednesday the residents of  Sydney had a taste of what that must have been like, with pictures such as this to provide evidence of Mother Nature in a nasty mood. This is a composite of several shots showing the Sydney Harbor Bridge in a very wide-angle view, shrouded in almost-Martian red dust.

94ns-smallFor  anyone who doubts that climate change is taking place, and that it poses a real threat to human civilization, events such as this provide a sharp reminder. In his article in The Guardian, Pearce wrote that as our planet grows dryer, it “is turning a series of local water shortages into a global food crunch.” He continued:

Britain is not immune. By my estimate, Britain imports each year about 40 cubic kilometres of virtual water in the form of food (sorry about the unit, but it is more than half the annual flow of the Nile). We like to think we have few water problems, but that’s because we can rely on other peoples’ water. For now.

As the world’s demand for water continues to grow, and as more and more rivers run dry, that doesn’t look so clever. Thanks to rising global demand and the increasing uncertainly of supply due to climate change, water is destined to be a growing food security issue in the 21st century. It is not hard to imagine a future world where countries that still have water will not export it as willingly as they do now. If that happens, importers like Britain could find themselves in trouble.

Food is the bottom-line requirement for human existence. We have heard that it shares that distinction with shelter and clothing, but it takes only a crude hut and a few scraps of cloth to provide those other needs. Without adequate food, no human can long survive. And without adequate water, there will not be enough food to provide for the 6.7 billion human beings now present on Planet Earth.

For more on the dangers to our environment, you may want to read my review of Pearce’s book, “With Speed and Violence — Why Scientists Fear Tipping Points in Climate Change,” posted here on May 12, 2007. Use the search field at the upper right to find that and other related articles.

California Vulnerable to Water Disaster

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

By David L. Brown

As our readers know we have pointed out many problems facing the Earth and human civilization. There is always a common denominator, it seems, a thread that winds its way through all the dangers facing our planet. That is the imbalance between growing human numbers with “improving” lifestyles and the ability of the planet to support the ever-upward pressure of economies and societies based solely on growth.

A recent issue of Science magazine contains an article that highlights one particular example of this, the growing imbalance between the demand of California residents and farmers and uncertainties about the supply of fresh water.

As is so often the case when examining environmental impacts on human beings, the problem in California is not just that there are more people demanding more water—there is also less water, thanks perhaps to climate change. A serious drought has been plaguing the Golden State for the past three years. According to the Science article, titled “California’s Water Crisis: Worse to Come?” (March 27, 2009 issue; subscription required) in February, “Central Valley farmers were told that all water deliveries would be halted, and State Water Project managers said they would be forced to cut water deliveries to just 15% of normal.”

California is the nation’s No. 1 producer of many food crops, and yet the abundance depends in very large part on irrigation. The state has hundreds of miles of canals and waterways such as this:

1665-1-med

This is a view of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the hub of California’s fresh water system. This waterway is girdled by more than a thousand miles of levees. According to hydrologists, the levees are bound to fail at some point in the future, creating future problems that could be catastrophic.

Meanwhile, though, it’s drought that is the problem. For now, late winter snowfall brought mountain snowpack up to 90 percent of normal, relieving pressure on administrators to cut off irrigation water to farmers. For now, the bullet has been dodged. However, recent trends have been ominous, hinting at more years of drought and water shortages.

Discussing the future of the delta, Robert F. Service the author of  the Science article writes:

Over the next few decades, a one-two punch of climate change and earthquakes is expected to change the delta dramatically. The delta contains some 1770 kilometers of levees holding back water from dozens of stadium-sized sunken “islands” inside which the land has subsided. By 2050, the chance of widespread levee failures is as high as 95%, due to runoff from the northern Sierras, which is predicted to be more concentrated in the late winter and early spring, and the increasing risk of earthquake, according to a report last summer by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC). If that occurs, salt water from the San Francisco Bay would rush in to fill the voids, dramatically increasing the salinity of water in the delta, possibly making it undrinkable. Adding sea-level rise to the equation–as climate models predict–brings the date of levee failures closer. “It will happen,” says Ellen Hanek, a PPIC economist in San Francisco.

This looming threat is merely a tiny sampling of a worldwide phenomenon that is threatening some of the regions where a large proportion of the world’s people live. The problem is that glaciers which feed rivers such as the Ganges in India, the Yellow and Yangtze in China, the Mekong in Vietnam and even the Po in Italy are melting. Snow alone does not feed the rivers a steady flow of water through the summer, and as global temperatures climb winter snow in the high mountains melts faster. The result is a growing tendency to disastrous flooding early in the season followed by drought just when crops need the water most.

Fresh water is just one of the many resources which are growing in short supply, and it is a crucial one to human existence. No form of agriculture has been devised that does not rely upon reliable and abundant sources of water. As the California example illustrates, even wealthy and advanced regions can be threatened when water scarcity spreads.

The World in 2100: A Choice of Futures

Friday, March 20th, 2009

By David L. Brown

Despite all the hullabaloo about global warming, the resulting climate change, and the impact on humanity, I continue to be amazed at the reluctance of those who discuss the subject to face up to the fact that Mother Nature is going to take care of the problem, perhaps quite soon.

A cover story in a recent issue of New Scientist included this image showing how the world might look in 2100 if the average temperature rises by 4º C.

26971701

Now this indicates that a pretty large section of the Earth is going to be quite a bit different from what we are used to. Yellow is desert and brown is uninhabitable. Now this is not going to be very scientific, because I am going to make a wild guess here. If you disagree, please insert the number you think is appropriate. My wild guess: This map indicates that the parts of the world where approximately 95 percent of human beings live is going to become either dry wasteland or totally unfit for human habitation.

So, how can we take this data point and create a conclusion? Well, first I will tell you what the New Scientist article more or less concluded. To wit, that an estimated nine billion people could be relocated to those areas in the far North and along the edge of Australia and a melting Antarctica. (In the interest of fairness, the writer did devote a scant two paragraphs to James Lovelock who opined that such an outcome was unlikely.)

And how is this miracle to be accomplished? Well, by allowing 20 square meters for each of the nine billion people, there will be plenty of space in Canada, Siberia, Northern Europe and so forth to house them. Of course, they will be a bit crowded, but nevermind, the author supposes that all those billions will be living in high rise buildings. Food would be produced by farming the former tundra land by some unexplained means.

Now, I don’t know about you but this sounds a little bit like a fantasy scenario. We will take all the people of the world, Arab camel drivers, Indian rag pickers, Pygmy hunger-gatherers, Wall Street bankers (oops, scratch that, they’ll soon be extinct), and transport them all up to Siberia or someplace in the Arctic region of Canada or Alaska, and put them all together in high rise buildings. All nine billion of them (and no doubt still continuing to breed toward the ten, eleven, twelve billion level)? Well, okay, now let me suggest that the comment she included for editorial balance from Lovelock makes a lot more sense. Here is what he said:

The only places we will be guaranteed enough water will be in the high latitudes. “Everything in that region will be growing like mad. That’s where all the life will be,” says former NASA scientist James Lovelock, who developed the “Gaia” theory, which describes the Earth as a self-regulating entity. “The rest of the world will be largely desert with a few oases.”
So if only a fraction of the planet will be habitable, how will our vast population survive? Some, like Lovelock, are less than optimistic. “Humans are in a pretty difficult position and I don’t think they are clever enough to handle what’s ahead. I think they’ll survive as a species all right, but the cull during this century is going to be huge,” he says. “The number remaining at the end of the century will probably be a billion or less.”

Now here are the two scenarios: First, nine billion people living in high rise buildings while growing crops on former tundra while most of the world turns to scorching desert, or, second, a “cull” during this century that is going to be “huge.”

Well, I know which way I’m going to bet. Meanwhile, we see stories like this one from today;s news:

PRINCETON, NJ — For the first time in Gallup’s 25-year history of asking Americans about the trade-off between environmental protection and economic growth, a majority of Americans say economic growth should be given the priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent.

Now this may sound innocuous on the surface, but think about this: The pursuit of a go-go growth economic model is what has gotten us where we are today, faced with environmental disaster, peak-Everything, famine, economic collapse, and climate change that could make the map above come to be reality. And given the choice between helping stave off the terrible problems that face us, most people in the end vote for the status quo, or even worse, for an impossible return to a condition that is no longer possible.

How will those millions of high-rise buildings be built up there in the presently frigid North considering that we are running out of easily produced natural resources such as oil, iron, copper, and a host of other commodities? Will some Magic Fairy appear and wave a wand? This reminds me of my previous essays in which is invoked The Rabbit of Unreasonable Hope, ready to be pulled out of a magician’s hat to solve all the problems we face.

Unfortunately, there is no fairy, there is no rabbit, there are no easy answers. But that’s okay because even though the problems facing humanity are beyond our ability to solve, Mother Nature is standing by to take control of Her planet once again. She has done it before and she knows what to do. She uses proven tools such as the concept of “overshoot and collapse,” the application of famine, plague, war and death (the famous Four Horsemen). And she can always count on the foolishness of mere human beings to aid her at every step along the way.

Food Supplies Losing Race to Famine

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

By David L. Brown

How thin is the line that divides world food supplies from famine? This thin: If China were to import another five percent of its total grain needs, it would completely eliminate all grain available in the world’s export markets.

The reason why this is is possible is due to the rapid industrialization of China. Prime farmland is being replaced by roads, factories, houses, and parking lots. Production of wheat, rice and corn is moving to lower quality land, and areas more prone to drought and heat events. Add in the growing number of Chinese, and their desire to consume more calories, and you have an interesting collision of forces.

Of course, I have written here before that I believe China is heading for a fall. The rising new middle class there may soon be a receding one, and industrialization already is slowing due to the collapse of export markets and may soon recede as well. But nevermind, the point of the statement above is to illustrate how vulnerable the Earth has become to food shortages.

The factoid I quoted (from this article on the Seed Daily web site) is merely one example of the forces at work as rising human population meets the declining resources of the planet. There are similar examples everywhere you look. Fisheries have virtually collapsed and trawlers are busy dredging the last living things from our oceans. Tillable land is being converted to uses other than agriculture, while soil erosion chips away at what is left. Resources of fresh water are being pumped from aquifers deep in the Earth, water that is not being replaced. These water sources will eventually run dry, and in fact already have done so in some places (i.e., Saudi Arabia).

The present economic slowdown may be the best news for the world, because it will slow the rising demand for higher standards of living, cause funding for infrastructure projects that gobble up farmland, and generally put a brake on the runaway train that the world economy has become. It may even help slow and reverse the growth of human numbers, which is the root cause of the threats to our ecosystem and the very future of civilization.

Yes, that may seem cold-hearted but it is appropriate on this 200th anniversary year of the birth of Charles Darwin to remember that the future belongs to the fittest, and that Mother Nature wields a pruning knife. Species come and go, adapt and evolve, and natural selection applies to all species including homo sapiens.

I suspect that Nature has never had to deal with anything quite like us, so it is not easy to predict how things will turn out. One lesson I think we can draw from geologic history is that conditions can turn on a dime. We all know the story of the asteroid that ended the Age of Dinosaurs. But more recently we have learned that the Younger Dryas, a thousand year return to Ice Age conditions about 12,000 years ago may have been caused by a comet impact over North America that could have killed off the Clovis human population as well as many of the megafauna that previously inhabited the hemisphere. Similar if less devastating events have happened at regular intervals throughout history. Such comet or asteroid strikes can affect the climate worldwide, creating short term freak cold spells or even, as in the case of the Younger Dryas, a centuries-long return to glacial periods.

Another worldwide effect results from major volcanic eruptions. Just a couple of decades ago we experienced the Mount Pinatubo eruption that cooled the entire Earth for several years. We are presently experiencing cooler conditions due to an unusual number of smaller eruptions during 2008.

Point: Human population and agricultural production is already balanced on the edge of disaster. What happens if even a modest climate-changing event should take place, such as Pinatubo? A reduction of just a few percentage points in world crop yields would be a disaster. A significant drop of 20 or 30 percent would mean absolute calamity. And, any study of history will tell us that such events are relatively common. In the brief period of time since about the end of WWII conditions have remained generally favorable. In the future, historians may consider that a tragedy rather than a boon, because it has allowed humanity to grow far beyond the ability of the Earth to sustain us.

Australian Climate Disaster Looms Closer

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

by Val Germann

It wasn’t big news here in the U.S., the reports late last week that Australia’s Prime Minister had broached the possibility of cutting off the water allotments for nearly half of Australia’s farmers. No, that story was lost in the glare of the Virginia Tech incident and other pressing U.S. events. And that story is still lost to our press, even as the American midwest prepares to turn one-third of its 2007 corn crop into ethanol. What would happen to commodity prices if later this year one of the world’s largest food exporters, Australia, suddenly was forced to enter the market as a massive buyer of agricultural products? That would be ugly, wouldn’t it? Yes, it would.

So, that’s not much of a story, is it? Well, yes, it IS a big story, huge in The Land Down Under where the shock waves will be felt for years to come, no matter what actually happens. The quote below, from the TERRADAILY website, gives the general idea:

The National Farmers’ Federation (NFF) said the move to cut off water in the 2007-08 financial year was unprecedented and that the organisation would seek urgent talks with the government. Laurie Arthur, the head of the NFF’s water task force, said orchards and vineyards would die without irrigation and would take years to replace. “We’ve never seen the like of this ever,” he told Sky News.

To understand the magnitude of the problem imagine that a water cut-off was being threatened for California’s central valley. The impact of even the possibility of such an event would be immediate, and severe, showing up in every U.S. consumer’s food bill. This would be true even though most U.S. consumers do not know how important the California central valley is, or even how important U.S. agriculture is. But they would soon be finding out!

So, truly, what does the future look like for Australian agriculture? Can things be as bad as the Prime Minister indicated when he said the situation was “in the lap of the gods”? And can prayer, which Mr. Howard also mentioned, be of any assistance? The Aussies could soon be finding out about these, too, because “The Big Dry” shows little sign of any long run abatement, which could bring on something like an agricultural apocalypse. Stated THE INDEPENDENT a few days ago:

A ban on irrigation, which would remain in place until May next year, spells possible ruin for thousands of farmers, already debt-laden and in despair after six straight years of drought.

This possibility has special resonance with this writer because back in the 1950s a second cousin and his family sold their U.S. farm and bought land in Australia, on the margin, back when it rained. They lost everything several years ago and their oldest son, who had abandoned the sinking family farm in despair, was killed in a auto accident. Such are the effects of drought, and big decisions that go bad because of drought. Multiply events like this by thousands if “The Big Dry” does not soon release its death grip on Australia’s farmers.

Trees … To Be or Not to Be

Saturday, April 21st, 2007

By David L. Brown

The growing concern about “global warming,” that misleading terminology used to define the climate change that is taking place on the Earth, has yielded a number of proposals to help mitigate the rise of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere that lie at the root of the problem. Many of these ideas revolve around the role of trees in our climate.

For example, it has become the “in thing” for the wealthy to plant trees to “offset” the carbon their activities release into the air. A rock and roll band recently did just that to offset the GHG released by the production and distribution of their latest album. Others have followed suit, “offsetting” their jet-setting lifestyles. These individuals believe that their tree planting efforts make them appear “green” as they continue their profligate lifestyles.

There are, however, some problems with this. First, even if the entire presently unforested areas of the planet’s surface were to be converted to an endless expanse of trees, it would not be able to compensate for the present rate of human produced carbon entering the air.

And, not all areas are suitable for arboriculture (tree farming). Imagine the results when some rock star attempts to plant a thousand hectares of trees in the middle of the Sahara Desert to offset the energy used by his private jet and you will see my point.

Then there is the all-important question of what impact planting all those trees would have on agriculture, that rather necessary activity that stands between humanity and mass starvation. Many of the same areas that might be converted to forests are needed to grow crops of another kind, for food. We humans are not like beavers or termites that can survive by munching on wood. Even the planet’s wide grasslands are needed to sustain wildlife and herds.

Now researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Berkeley, California have come up with a new climate model that contradicts the idea that trees are a good thing for atmospheric GHG.

(more…)

Biofuel Craze May Ruin World’s Forests

Sunday, March 25th, 2007

by Val Germann

Yes, it is now a “craze,” this rush toward “biofuels.”  It all sounds so good, at first glance, and terms like “clean diesel” seem like harbingers of a hydrocarbon promised land.  But as we have been writing for months here at Star Phoenix Base, there is always a price to pay, always, and there are no free lunches in the natural world.  This fact is starkly highlighted in a recent article on the INTER PRESS SERVICE website.  Here’s a sample:

“Biofuels are rapidly becoming the main cause of deforestation in countries like Indonesia, Malaysia and Brazil,” said Simone Lovera, managing coordinator of the Global Forest Coalition, an environmental NGO based in Asunción, Paraguay. “We call it ‘deforestation diesel’,” Lovera told IPS. 

Now, there’s a term that you don’t see very often, to say the least.  But can this be true?  Can biofuels, part of the newest “green revolution,” actually be that harmful?  Yes.

Biodiesel offers many environmental benefits over diesel from petroleum, including reductions in air pollutants, but the enormous global thirst means millions more hectares could be converted into monocultures of oil palm.  Oil palm has become the world’s number one fruit crop, well ahead of bananas.

And there’s the rub, the enormous world wide demand for energy can never be met through biofuels, not if the human race is going to eat, too, and the world’s forests survive.  Every gallon of  “clean diesel” or corn-based ethanol takes food out of someone’s mouth, or helps chop down a natural forest, one way or another.

Read the entire IPS article and consider where this new mania for biofuels may eventually lead.  Perhaps it would be best to call the whole thing off, and soon.

**

Africa’s “Great Lakes” All Facing Destruction

Friday, December 15th, 2006

by Val Germann

There can be little doubt that a world wide drought is well under way.  The American west has been suffering severe water shortages for years, as has most of Australia.  Brazil is in dought, too, and the Amazon under increasing pressure.  But the leader today has to be Africa where drought is killing thousands of people per month and threatening entire cultures, with no end in sight. 

A recent Associated Press report highlights the shocking water problems in Africa, especially for its lakes, which seem to be drying up.  Lake Victoria, the headwaters of the Nile, has been dropping fast, along with Lake Chad and Lake Tanganyika.  Can Star Phoenix Base readers imagine what might happen if the Nile were to be reduced by say, half?  Such a thing is now possible, as is revealed in this article.  

Now, in a yet unpublished report obtained by The Associated Press, an international consulting firm advises the Ugandan government that supercomputer models of global-warming scenarios for Lake Victoria “raise alarming concerns” about its future and that of the Nile River, which begins its 4,100-mile northward journey here at Jinja.

Things are already pretty bad on the lake and the people who depend on it.  And conditions are not improving.

In Jinja, 40 miles east of Kampala, researchers at the Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization said falling water levels are the latest blow to the dying biology of Lake Victoria, where pollution has helped kill off scores of unique species of tropical fish in recent decades. Now tilapia, once a prime food fish, are declining because their inshore breeding grounds are vanishing.  “People for many years haven’t seen such a sudden change in the lake level,” said the fisheries office’s Richard Ogutu-Ohwayo, a biologist on the lake for 35 years. “Right now it’s very difficult to say what will happen. It’s a grim scenario, of worldwide climate change.”  

Yes, it is, especially when combined with overfishing and human-generated pollution.  Lake Victoria has been in trouble for many years, biologically, and this latest stress producer is only accelerating well established trends.   Unfortuntely, the situation is the same across most of the continent and its giant lakes. 

An extreme example lies 1,500 miles northwest of here, deeper in the drought zone, where Lake Chad, once the world’s sixth-largest, has shrunk to 2 percent of its 1960s size. And the African map abounds with other, less startling examples, from Lake Turkana in northern Kenya, getting half the inflow it once did, to the great Lake Tanganyika south of here, whose level dropped over five feet in five years.

Where is all of this leading?  Well, with atmospheric warming racing ahead across the globe there seems little doubt that the drying will continue into the indefinite future.   And nowhere is the future more indefinite than in Africa, where all the world’s problems seem to have taken root, with increasing vengeance every year. 

**

Water Shortages Threaten World with Famine

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006

By David L. Brown

Who will feed the growing populations of the world’s third world countries in the coming years? Yes, the threat of famine has been dismissed repeatedly ever since Paul Ehrlich and others raised a warning in the 1960s, but it is no longer possible to ignore these problems.

Take China as an example. The Middle Kingdom has a population of over one billion, and that figure is projected to grow to 1.5 billion by mid-century. Unfortunately for China, its ability to produce food has peaked and may be falling. The reasons are many, including loss of topsoil to erosion, but the most ominous sign is that China is running out of water. Here is a statement from a recent e-mail alert I received from the Earth Policy Institute:

Historically, water scarcity was a local issue. It was up to national governments to balance water supply and demand. Now this is changing as scarcity crosses national boundaries via the international grain trade. Since it takes 1,000 tons of water to produce one ton of grain, importing grain is the most efficient way to import water. Countries are, in effect, using grain to balance their water books. Similarly, trading in grain futures is in a sense trading in water futures.

Falling water tables are already adversely affecting harvests in some countries, including China, the world’s largest grain producer. Overpumping has largely depleted the shallow aquifer under the North China Plain, forcing farmers to turn to the region’s deep fossil aquifer, which is not replenishable. Wheat farmers in some areas of the Plain are now pumping from a depth of 300 meters, or nearly 1,000 feet.

Overall, China’s grain production has fallen from its historical peak of 392 million tons in 1998 to an estimated 358 million tons in 2005. This drop of 34 million tons exceeds the Canadian wheat harvest. China largely covered the drop-off in production by drawing down its once vast stocks until 2004, at which point it imported 7 million tons of grain.

This information is adapted from the recently published book Plan B 2.0 written by the Institute’s president, Lester R. Brown. Brown is a prominent spokesman for the issues of global climate change, overpopulation, and food production.

(more…)